Ultima is a Curandera in Bless Me, Ultima by Rudolfo...

In the novel Bless Me, Ultima by Rudolfo Anaya, one of the main characters, Ultima is accused many times of being a witch. Ultima is a curandera who uses herbs and medicines to cure people. She goes to live with Antonio Marez, a young boy who lives in the llano with his parents and two sisters due to the fact that she cannot live by herself and had nowhere to stay. Although many people think she is a witch, her use of herbs, medicines, and scapulars show that she is merely just a curandera. With her use of chants and having her spirit in her owl, many are led to believe that she is really a witch. Ultima goes to stay with Antonio Marez, a young boy who lives in the llano with his parents, two sister, and three brothers. This is because†¦show more content†¦The curse was most likely placed on him by the Trementina sisters, three witches who are sisters, because Lucas observed them performing some sort of mass that witches have. First, she makes remedies and makes him drink th em. Afterwards, after resting, Lucas starts coughing and he coughs out vomit and a big ball of hair. This was his hair with which they had worked the evil. Ultima cured Lucas using only natural herbs and medicines. She did not perform any witchcraft. She also did this with the help of Antonio as well. Many people in the town love Ultima. They praise her and can’t thank her enough when she cures one of their loved ones. While many love and praise her, a select few in the town believe that Ultima is a witch and of ten accuse Ultima of it. One of these is Tenorio Trementina, the father of the three Trementina sisters who put a curse on Lucas, Antonio’s uncle. Even Antonio, who loves Ultima very much, once doubted if Ultima was really a witch or just a curandera. Some of Antonio’s classmates have also called Ultima a witch. Tenorio often besieges Ultima. Despite all this, Ultima is still very strong and remains strong until the day of her death. Ultima is also very brave strong. She is not threatened when Tenorio threatens to kill Ultima or when people make the sign of the cross to see if she really is a witch. To conclude, Ultima is accused by some of being a witch because her use of chants and having her spirit inShow MoreRelated A Comparison of Bless Me Ultima and The House on Mango Street2154 Words   |  9 PagesExploring Syncretism in Bless Me Ultima and The House on Mango Street      Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Syncretism is the fine line between Christianity and Native American Religions because it is the ambivalent, simultaneous attraction of choice and identification to the influences of two or more religious belief systems. Syncretism is most common among minority groups such as Hispanics. The definition applied to their unique position of culture is brought about by the Native American and Spanish ancestry. AmbivalenceRead MoreBless Me Ultima Analysis1203 Words   |  5 Pagespoem, â€Å"Curandera†, by Pat Mora and the novel, â€Å"Bless Me, Ultima†, by Rudolfo Anaya portray the curandera in different and similar ways. The literary works consist of common characteristics and qualities that the curanderos possess irrespective of the different genders. In both poems, the curanderos are knowledgeable. Besides, they have a close connection with nature, and the people from their towns respect them greatly. Bless Me, Ultima is Anaya’s first novel in which he describes the curandera, UltimaRead MoreEssay on Bless Me Ultima1232 Words   |  5 PagesJasmine Tran Ms. Brzowski English 2 PDP - Period 1 09.12.2012 Seminar Notes: Bless Me Ultima 1. Bless Me Ultima fits the description of magical realism because the story talks a lot about a curandera named Ultima. As we all know, a curandera is a healer. Rudolfo Anaya portrays Ultima as this old lady who has magical and spiritual powers. She seems to bring life to things around her. When she came the beauty of the llano unfolded before my eyes, and the gurgling waters of the river sang toRead More Bless Me, Ultima by Rudolfo Anaya Essay1652 Words   |  7 PagesBless Me, Ultima by Rudolfo Anaya Children believe what their parents tell them but as they get older they start to question that which used to be unquestionable. Bless Me, Ultima is a novel by Rudolfo Anaya about a young Chicano boy, Antonio Juan Marez y Luna, who is growing up and seeing the world for how cruel it really is. A wise old curandera, or faith healer, Ultima, arrives just before Tony receives his first glimpse into the world of men. Ultima gives Tony spiritual healing throughoutRead More`` Bless Me, Ultima `` By Rudolfo Anaya983 Words   |  4 PagesRudolfo Anaya, author of â€Å"Bless Me, Ultima†, uses countless examples of folk-lore all throughout his novel. In doing so, he gives his readers great insight to the Mexican-American culture of the 1940’s during World War II, and how different the culture is than how most people are raised. The folk-lore Anaya used most effectively throughout â€Å"Bless Me, Ultima† is; the whole idea of growing up and becoming a man, beliefs of witch craft, children losing their innocence and the characters religious beliefsRead MoreSummary Of Bless Me, Ultima By Rudolfo Anaya1180 Words   |  5 Pagespurity and sin that comes with this life is what brings them to become equivocal and controversial as to what is right and wrong. Thoughts of doubt may not be cleared up, but it will allow one to find a path they pertain to. A novel, Bless Me, Ultima by Rudolfo Anaya relates to this concept in the sense that the main character Antonio Mà ¡rez is conflicted due to the deaths he encounters which alters his beliefs. ​The war took Antonio’s three older brothers, but not only taking them, but also a warRead MoreSummary : Bless Me, Ultima, Rudolfo Anaya Essay1697 Words   |  7 Pageswitches are portrayed in our modernistic era. In the novel, Bless Me, Ultima, Rudolfo Anaya depicts the development of Ultima, an old curandera, to symbolize a recurrent theme of how being different is looked down upon. Although being accused of witchcraft has had a negative connotation all throughout history, there is a fine line between using witchcraft for good rather than evil. Witchcraft can have two connotations in regards to Bless Me, Ultima, seeing as there are those individuals who support Ultima’sRead MoreEssay about Icons of Ambivalence in Bless Me Ultima2208 Words   |  9 PagesIcons of Ambivalence in Bless Me Ultima  Ã‚        Ã‚   The portrait of Mexican Americans is layered in shades of ambivalence. Aside from the fact there is evidence that they can not really be classified as a migratory culture in that the land where they tend to migrate once belonged to Mexico, they can also lay an earlier claim to the land as Native Americans. The Spanish Europeans who settled in the area that became Mexico evolved as the dominant culture over the oral culture of the Native AmericansRead More Anayas Bless Me, Ultima: A Psychological Critique of Religions841 Words   |  4 Pagesand questioned. This is the journey that Antonio Marex Luna explores in Rudolfo Anaya’s (1972) Chicano novel Bless Me, Ultima. Throughout the novel, Antonio fights a psychological war in his mind about all the religions and faiths that surround him in his everyday routine. All his life he was raised to believe in God, and as a result he grew to be a devote Catholic. However, some of his beliefs alter when Ultima, a curandera, comes to live with his family. By witnessing her mysterious powers, AntonioRead MoreMyth, Religion, and Violence in Pan’s Labyrinth and Bless Me, Ultima: A Comparative Analysis1346 Words   |  6 PagesRudolfo Anaya’s, Bless Me, Ultima and Guillermo del Toro’s, Pan’s Labyrinth are two coming-of-age stories. Both the novel and the movie are full of events that contribute to the disillusionment of the main character’s childhood idealism and the realization of the real world they live in. Both protagonists absorb themselves in a mythical world full of fantasy and each receives exposure to religious theology and trauma by the violence of men. Despite t he fact that Antonio and Ofelia have different

Essay about 1912 Election - 1032 Words

The Effects on American Politics From the Election of 1912 During the Progressive Era, Americans faced the challenge of choosing between four strong candidates of the election of 1912. Each candidate held concrete platforms that would have different effects on progressivism. Americans could chose the conservative presidential incumbent William Howard Taft(R), the New Jersey governor Woodrow Wilson (D), the long-time fighter for social reform-Eugene V. Debs (S), or the former president Theodore Roosevelt of the newly formed Bull Moose Party (Progressive Party). Through this election many steps were taken to change the face of the election season, including womens rights, primaries, and third†¦show more content†¦In the August before the election, the most successful third party in the 20th century was formed. After Theodore Roosevelt was denied the Republican nomination, he was elected in the newly formed Progressive Party. Theodore was the man for the job saying, In loyalty, honor and duty there was nothing for me to do but to heed their call and make the race with all my might, regardless of present or future consequences to myself. (Miller 527) With this spirit, this third party had accomplished the unthinkable by becoming in second in the presidential election of 1912. This was the only time in American history that the Republican Party has come in third in both the popular and electoral vote. Sidney M. Milkis stated, Ostensibly, the cause of ProgressivismÂâ€"the platforms commitment to direct democracy and social and industrial justiceÂâ€"gave reform leadership its dignity, indeed its heroic quality.(Claremont Institute) The Progressive Partys accomplishment proved that third parties can have influence on an election and they are not to be taken lightly. This election served as the initial step into the world of politics for women. The Progressive Party was the only main party to support womens rights, and women were extremely active in supporting it. The Kansas newspaper editor William Allen White stated referring to the Progressive Party Convention: We were, of course, for woman suffrage, and we invited women delegates and had plenty of them. They were ourShow MoreRelatedThe 1912 Crucial Election1346 Words   |  6 PagesThe year 1912 brought one of the most important presidential elections in United States history. Four nominees confronted one another during this election: Democratic candidate Woodrow Wilson, Progressive leader Theodore â€Å"Teddy† Roosevelt, Republican William Howard Taft, and Socialist Eugene Debs. This election also proved to be crucial as it brought forth new considerable and â€Å"substantive† discussions concerning the Union and its future. These issues included, whether government should expandRead MoreThe Presidential Election Of 1912888 Words   |  4 PagesThe presidential election of 1912 was fought amongst four major candidates. Woodrow Wilson was brought up by his father, a Presbyterian minister, and his mother, daughter of a Presbyterian minister brought up Woodrow Wilson. He was president of Princeton University and governor of New Jersey. He represented the Democratic Party and had a combination of high morality and high-minded detachment. Eugene Debs was a well-known Socialist and union man for the Fireman’s Brotherhood and American RailroadRead MoreThe Election of 1912 Essay1054 Words   |  5 PagesThe Election of 1912 During the Progressive Era, Americans faced the challenge of choosing between four strong candidates of the election of 1912. Each candidate held concrete platforms that would have different effects on progressivism. Americans could chose the conservative presidential incumbent William Howard Taft(R), the New Jersey governor Woodrow WilsonRead MoreThe Presidential Election Of 1912 Essay1664 Words   |  7 PagesPresidential Election of 1912 In the presidential election of 1912 the Democrat Woodrow Wilson, Progressive Theodore Roosevelt, Republican William Howard Taft, and Socialist Eugene Debs all had their opposing views on the issues that concerning the future of democracy in America. Some of the issues were; the Conservation of Natural Resources, Direct Democracy, Labor, Race, Tariff, Trusts and Regulation of Business, and votes for Women. Majority of the people desired change, as would I if I were toRead MoreWoodrow Wilson Presidency : Election Of 19121080 Words   |  5 PagesPRESIDENCY Election of 1912 The election of 1912 involved four candidates: Democrat Woodrow Wilson, Republican William Howard Taft, Socialist Eugene V. Debs, and Progressive Theodore Roosevelt. The two major candidates in the 1912 election would be Roosevelt and Wilson. Wilson’s proposal of New Freedom engaged his supporters. The New Freedom notion intended to eliminate all trusts instead of just regulating them in hopes of an economic competition restoration. On the day of the Election in 1912, WilsonRead MoreAmerica s New Sense Of World Power758 Words   |  4 Pagesrealized that by instituting Dollar Diplomacy, it would be subtly harmful to the financial gain of other countries, providing great benefits to the United States. This didn’t necessarily ensure new land for America, but ensured allies. In the election of 1912, Moral Diplomacy was introduced. Moral Diplomacy is a form of Diplomacy proposed by President Woodrow Wilson. Moral Diplomacy is the system in which support is given only to countries whose moral beliefs are equal to that of the nation. DoingRead MoreSenate Election Reform Essay1101 Words   |  5 Pagesbehaviour; their elections made by electors chosen for that purpose by the people† (Senate Report No. 691). As the United States developed after the civil war and people gained greater access to news and education they began to see the corruption within the senate appointment process. This started a push for electoral reform and the progressive movement. It should not be over looked either that the election of Senators by popular vote would not only leave the nomination and election of the membersRead MoreThe Success Of The Third Party System743 Words   |  3 PagesAmericans believed that a third political party was needed, as only 37% agreed with the effectiveness of a two-party system. This information can be seen as the popularity of third-party candidates has increased over the last three presidential election cycles. The reasons for this increase include; a lack of support to a particular party, disenfranchised from the mainstream party platform, or a belief that their vote is more symbolic to demonstrate a lack of confidence in the two-party systemRead MoreThe Political System Of The United States Essay1364 Words   |  6 PagesFor over a century, the American presidency has been controlled by the two major parties as no third party has broken through to win a presidential election. In fact, from the point of view of the two major parties, the third parties contending for the presidencies have been nothing but nuisances, taking votes away from the parties that legitimately have a shot at the presidency. However, as historian Richard Hofstadter said, â€Å"Third parties are like bees: once they have stung, they die.† HofstadterRead More third parties Essay1483 Words   |  6 Pages Despite being the constant underdog and loser in major elections third parties make some significant contribution to the political spectrum in the United States. Third Party Agendas are taken serious by the Democratic and Republican Parties and specific pieces of the Third Party Agendas are sometimes adopted by the two major parties. Third parties give discontented voters other alternatives. The Republican and Democratic Parties have been known to operate in similar styles and third parties give

Justice in Plato’s Republic Free Essays

Plato Republic presents the concepts of psychic justice and psychic virtue. This is different from what in normally observed as justice and virtue. Thus, when apparently good deeds are ostensibly rewarded, and, correspondingly, evils deeds are punished, that is considered to be justice. We will write a custom essay sample on Justice in Plato’s Republic or any similar topic only for you Order Now But Plato is suggesting that appearances are deceptive, and that true justice and virtue are not so easily recognizable. The matter needs to be considered by essences, not appearances. In this way is derived psychic justice and virtue. And when we arrive at the latter understanding we overcome the contradictions found in the first view. For in the apparent view evil seems to be rewarded, while virtue is punished, in the normal course of life. The object of Plato is thus to convince that the just life in preferable to the unjust. As in all the dialogues of Plato, the argument is presented as that of Socrates, and in which the Athenian philosopher systematically overcomes all possible objections to the proposed thesis. Republic is possibly the most elaborately presented argument of Plato, and is also the longest. This essay argues that all the objections raised, by the friends and acquaintances of Socrates, regarding the principle proposition stated above, are answered comprehensively. Evidence seems to contradict the claim of Socrates that the just life is always to be preferred, and this is the principle objection raised by all detractors. In Book I the objection is raised by the rich host Cephalus, and by the cynical Thrasymachus. Cephalus is not confrontational, but merely smug in his conviction that wealth has allowed him to practice virtue. Socrates confounds him by asking whether he would return a lethal weapon to its rightful owner when it is certain that he is not in the right frame of mind and will commit mischief with it. Thrasymachus is intolerant of the dialectical method of Socrates, and demands a positive answer to the question of what justice is. He himself volunteers the positive opinion that justice is the interest of the powerful. Socrates makes the argument that no act is in the interest of the powerful, but is necessarily in the interest of the weaker. For example, the potter makes pots for those who have no inkling of the art of pottery, but would nevertheless like to use one. The potter (the strong) is successful if he can satisfy the non-potter (the weak). Since justice must be equated with success, the just act is committed in the interest of the weak. By a similar argument, the just act cannot inflict harm, neither to the just subject, nor to the recipient of justice, and in this way Socrates refutes the other claim of Thrasymachus that the unjust are happy, while the just suffer. This is the substance of the argument the Glaucon and Adeimantus have so far absorbed, and are only partially convinced by. They remain in the company after Thrasymachus and Cephalus have departed, and are the principal agents to take the argument forward. They proceed to raise the same challenge of Thrasymachus, but in a less confrontational way, and with an earnest inclination to find out. Socrates’ conclusion that the just are rewarded while the unjust destroy themselves seems to them to utterly contradict plain evidence. Glaucon cannot accept that acts of justice are desired â€Å"both for their own sake and for the sake of their results† (Plato 45). Everyone knows, he suggests, that the virtuous act is undertaken with a dread of unpleasant consequences. He puts forward a picture of two extremes; on the one hand there is the rich hypocrite who the world recognizes as virtuous, and on the other the poor and virtuous man who is also castigated by society as evil. This is not far removed from reality, and Glaucon pleads where the benefits of justice and virtue are in view here. Adeimantus stresses the same point, going further to quote the poets who maintain â€Å"that honesty is for the most part less profitable than dishonesty; and they are quite ready to call wicked men happy†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Ibid 53). Socrates at this point brings forward the crux of his argument – it is a ploy to consider the macrocosm before the microcosm. Justice and virtue must prevail in the Republic before it is possible at the atomic level of the individual. If the Republic is just, then its virtues will be far more visible than it would be in the case of the individual, and this due to its size. The workings of the state are more open to examination then the workings of the soul. In this wise Socrates is prepared to embark on an epic reconstruction of the Republic. Much of this discussion in phrased in terms of â€Å"should be†, but it is important that we remember that it is not political science which Plato is attempting. The Republic is put forward only as a mirror to the soul. It is phrased in terms of â€Å"should be† because justice is the quest, and the just Republic is necessarily constructed on what ought to be. Once justice is located here, and recognized, it throws invaluable light on the corresponding map of the soul. In the end Glaucon and Adeimantus are convinced that there is justice in the Republic. Each step in Socrates’ argument is built on the idea that the unjust, as a league, are incapable of any constructive effort. Even while refuting Thrasymachus, Socrates has argued that the unjust are against both their own kind, and their opposite kind (the just), while the just, at the very least, are in favor of the just. Therefore, all that is constructive and beneficial stems from the virtue of the just. On this crucial argument Socrates bases his reconstruction, and therefore justice is seen to prevail in every facer of the Republic. What exactly this justice is Socrates confesses not to know, yet there are three other qualities that must precede it – wisdom, courage and temperance. Each member of society has a requisite knowledge which answers a calling in life, and which is necessary for survival. The sum of such atomized knowledge is the wisdom of the state. The highest calling of all is that of the guardians of the state, and in them is the greatest wisdom, for they guide all others and thereby secure the greatest good. In particular, they determine the education, and they censor the arts, knowing what is conducive to the whole. Courage is in the defenders of the state. Temperance in distributed throughout society, for everyone must know the right measure of things. Socrates argues that both wealth and poverty are detrimental to the artisan. Wealth makes him inattentive to his art, while in poverty he cannot afford the means to practice. Therefore, the circumstances that prevail in a healthy Republic forces temperance on one and all. If this is a just Republic, argues Socrates, where justice, wisdom, courage and temperance prevail, than justice must be that which is left after wisdom, courage and temperance have been extracted from the whole. Having identified justice in the macrocosm, Socrates goes on to find its correspondence in the microcosm, which is in the soul of man. He distinguishes two types of knowledge, one guided by the rational principle, the other following the appetites, or the gratification of the five senses. Just as the higher wisdom of the guardians in the state guide the knowledge of all others, so the rational principle of the soul controls the appetites, and this makes for the wisdom of the soul. In the case of the Republic it has been shown that if each individual is allowed to function properly in his own calling then this constitutes justice in the wider body politic. Similarly, when the rational principle of the soul guides every facet of the human to function properly, then not only has the individual attained to justice, but also to health, for then each part is in harmony with the other and there is no discord. In this state justice, wisdom, courage and temperance prevail together, and as in the case of the Republic, justice is that which remains after the other three. We call this psychic justice, because we do not see it for itself, but only discover its existence after examination of the human psyche. It is not possible to refute the existence of psychic justice, and all the objections raised against it have been answered completely by Socrates. It is only a question of how worthy one considers it to be. It is not only a question of following the argument, but also of perceiving the inner import of it. Socrates therefore provides three answers to the same question, suited to the attitudes of the questioners. Cephalus must only be disturbed from his smug righteousness. The confrontational Thrasymachus can only be refuted with hard logic, for he cannot be made to comprehend. In Glaucon and Adeimantus, however, Socrates senses a desperate willingness to learn. â€Å"[T]here is something truly divine in being able to argue as you have done for the superiority of injustice,† he tells them, â€Å"and remaining unconvinced by your own arguments† (Ibid 58). The analogy of the Republic is introduced only to answer this honest query. In effect it is the same answer arrived at as the previous two, but nevertheless is special because it allows scope for inner comprehension. This is what Glaucon and Adeimantus come to in the end, and it is far more worth while to them then to merely follow logic. Of course appearances will continue to deceive, and Socrates maintains throughout that he still does not know what justice is. But if the only acquisition is a strengthening of faith in the higher justice, then the gain is substantial. To conclude, Plato introduces the concept of psychic justice, the purpose of which it to contradict the popular notion that the wicked and unjust reap the fruits of the world, while the just are easy prey for the evildoers. He introduces the analogy of the Republic, which is presented as the macrocosm that mirrors the microcosm that is the soul of man. In this way he identifies the justice that prevails in the Republic, and then finds the counterpart justice in the soul of man. In my opinion, psychic justice is to be considered above the apparent notions of justice, because appearances deceive. Plato raises his argument on the essential considerations of the human soul, and it is thus irrefutable. How to cite Justice in Plato’s Republic, Papers

Cosy play Essay Example For Students

Cosy play Essay An Inspector Calls is writing by J. B. Priestly and was published in 1946. The play is set in 1912 and is about how the upper classed people treated the lower/working class people.  Priestly has written more than 20 plays and is said to be a theatrical entrepreneur. His full name is John Boynton Priestly and he was born in Bradford, Yorkshire on 13 September 1894.  The name Priestly gives Inspector Goole is really an awful pun. In that respect, it might as well be seen as contributing a threat to his serious intention. Priestly makes him an impressive man who dominates proceedings. However, there is a subtly about him. He is there as the conscience of the rest, and there is an insistence from him on moral vows. A quote telling me this is, We dont live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other. And I tell you that the time will soon come when, if men will not learn that lesson, they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish. This gives the impression that the Inspector is a catalyst, effective in changing others whilst needing no change in himself. The quote above I think is trying to make the Birling family feel guilty and to confess what they have done. Priestly has giving the impression of Mr Birling as being pompous and self-centred. He has practical views and takes pride in himself.  Shelia Birling on the other hand stands in the play as being the most significant exemplar of virtue. Yet at the beginning of the play we find her to be rather spoilt and the centre of attention. Towards the end of the play though, she makes the moral points. I tell you, whoever that Inspector was, it was way anything but a joke. You knew it then. You began to learn something. And now youve stopped. Youre ready to go on in the same old ways. This quote is Sheila trying to bring home to her parents and her the meaning of the Inspectors message. She is saying that her family, the Birlings and Geralds attitude changed during the Inspectors visit but since hes gone they are ready to go back to their same, stuck up, selfish ways. At the beginning of the play, the Birling family and Gerald are all on stage to show they are one family. The lighting is pink and intimate which shows the audience that they are happy and quite carefree. But when the Inspector enters the lighting changes. It becomes brighter and harder. This makes it more dramatic. It shakes the audience out of their expectations of a cosy play.  The Inspectors entrance is dramatic as before he enters Mr Birling is giving some advice to Gerald and Eric. A Quote telling me this is, that man has to mind his own business and look after himself and his own and - This quote is telling me that Mr Birling is telling Gerald and Eric to look after themselves, their business and their family, nobody else. The Inspectors entrance is made dramatic because he comes to prove them wrong. Through out the play the Inspector goes through each individual character under covering what they had each done to make Eva Smith commit suicide. He was in charge. Priestly makes him an impressive man who dominates proceedings. He has to interrupted flows of conversation massively. A quote telling me this is, Gerald I dont see why Inspector Never mind that. You can settle this afterwards. (To Sheila) What happened? This quote is telling me that the Inspector likes to concentrate on one person at a time. If something is unnecessary then he doesnt want to no. .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367 , .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367 .postImageUrl , .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367 , .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367:hover , .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367:visited , .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367:active { border:0!important; } .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367:active , .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367 .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u99d518a94d5f89298adef91a21ffd367:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Wouldn't get any education EssayNone of these characters have committed a crime but they all come to feel themselves as murders.  At the beginning of act three, Eric confesses that hed slept with Eva Smith and the Inspector leaves. His exit is dramatic as he walks straight out leaving them starring and speechless. The Inspector has achieved his objections. Towards the end of the play after the Inspector leaves we find out that there was no Inspector and no dead girl. A quote from Mr Birling is, Well heres to use. Come on Shelia, dont look like that. Its all over now. This is telling me they are ready to forget the whole thing. Right at the end the telephone rings. Its the police saying a girl has died and a police Inspector is on his way. I think Priestly has added this to imply that in some way this girl died because they have not learnt their lesson.